I recently checked out a volume entitled A Book of Ruskin from the University Library. It is a small pocket-size compendium of excerpts from John Ruskin’s writings, published in 1927. It has a heavily worn, navy blue, hardback cover which seems to be falling off at the binding. The pages are aged, a little crumpled and rather yellow. It smells very, very musty. It is the kind of book I like.
In it, are a selection of Ruskin’s letters, both private and public, and I came across one which I particularly enjoyed, entitled ‘A Biting Retort’. By way of background, Ruskin was a staunch critic of the laissez-faire economics of his day. Part of his argument was that modern capitalism turned the lower-class factory worker into little more than a human machine – simply a means of production for the national economy. The working class were given simple, repetitive, menial jobs, with long hours and low pay, in terrible conditions, and this was said to be their fair lot in life. In addition to the obvious social injustice issues here, Ruskin argued that this robbed working class ‘work’ of any pleasure or beauty, because it destroyed its creative element (see his essay ‘The Nature of The Gothic’ in The Stones of Venice). Ruskin saw this as a deep injustice at the heart of modern, Victorian society, that was dehumanizing and anti-life. The following exchange comes in this context, and concerns a misunderstanding of Ruskin’s critique as concerned simply with an attack on machinery. I will quote in full from the book:
“A somewhat impertinent critic once wrote to Ruskin:
Since you disparage so much iron and its manufacture, may it be asked how your books are printed, and how is their paper made? Probably you are aware that both printing and paper-making machines are made with that material.
To this Ruskin replied as follows:
Sir,
I am indeed aware that printing and paper-making machines are made of iron. I am aware also, which you perhaps are not, that ploughshares and knives and forks are. And I am aware, which you certainly are not, that I am writing with an iron pen. And you will find in ‘Fors Clavigera’, and in all my other writings which you may have done me the honour to read, that my statement is that things which have to do the work of iron should be made of iron and things which have to do the work of wood should be made of wood ; but that (for instance) hearts should not be made of iron, nor heads of wood – and this last statement you may wisely consider when next it enters yours to ask questions.
I am, Sir,
Your obedient servant,
J.Ruskin
(Corpus Christi College, Oxford. February 10, 1872)”.
Superb!
comments